Contacts
Attorneys

- Principal
- Jeffrey S. Aronoff
- Michael P. McGee
- Christopher M. Trebilcock
- Amanda Van Dusen
- Of Counsel
- Don M. Schmidt
- Senior Counsel
- William B. Beach
- Donald W. Keim
- Senior Attorney
- G. Alan Wallace
- Associate
- Laura M. Bassett
News
Alerts
Articles
Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreements
With local government budgets under the most severe pressure in a generation, local leaders are taking a fresh look at intergovernmental cooperation. With good reason -- the advantages are appealing: Reduced personnel and other overhead costs lead to more efficiencies. Parties with common jurisdiction reduce duplication of effort and jurisdictional problems. Better service is provided at lower cost.
But let the negotiator beware: There has never been a discussion about governmental cooperation that didn’t involve four central (and difficult) issues: Control, funding, dispute resolution and dissolution. These issues must be addressed thoughtfully in any successful agreement.
What are other obstacles to successful cooperative arrangements? Employment and benefit concerns and the impact on collective bargaining units can be difficult issues. Assuring clear lines of authority and control and allocating revenues and obligations are other major structural points to be overcome. To this traditional list add conflict-of-interest and incompatibility issues which are becoming more common.
Miller Canfield attorneys have earned a reputation for innovation and creativity in putting together successful ventures serving our clients’ needs. Put our experience to work for you.
Representative Matters
- Aerotropolis Legislation and Intergovernmental Agreement
Represented a Michigan County in both formulating legislation and crafting the public-private intergovernmental agreement between two counties, four cities, and three townships to establish an aerotropolis aimed at attracting logistics, transportation and manufacturing firms to transportation hubs and other regional facilities.

Follow Us on Twitter